The Karate Kid Part II (1986) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

The Karate Kid Part II1986

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

The Karate Kid Part II is about as non-woke as it gets for an '80s film. It respects culture, celebrates family and masculine virtues, and avoids the pitfalls of forced modern ideology. A breath of fresh air compared to today’s heavy-handed entries.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film largely focuses on character growth, respect, and authentic martial arts tradition. Identity traits such as race or gender are not front and center, and characters earn their competence through action rather than being granted it automatically. There’s no sense that diversity is forced or that characters are flawless.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Family, honor, and tradition are at the film's core. Masculinity is depicted positively through sacrifice and discipline, while strong family and mentor-student bonds are emphasized in a mostly respectful light. No major subversion or revisionism is on display.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

While American and Japanese cultures are sometimes contrasted, both are given fair treatment. Traditional and alternative perspectives are acknowledged, and dissenting voices aren’t villainized. The film promotes cross-cultural understanding but doesn’t mock or erase traditional views.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The Karate Kid Part III

37%

93%

22%

Movie poster for The Muppets Take Manhattan

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.