The King of Comedy (1982) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

The King of Comedy1982

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

In our view, 'The King of Comedy' is refreshingly non-woke by modern standards, its narrative and social commentary stick to timeless human flaws, not ideological agendas or identity politicking. The focus is story and character, not checklists.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film is intensely character-driven, focusing on Rupert Pupkin's obsession and delusion without shoehorning in modern identity politics. Characters are written based on depth and realism, not demographic check-boxes. No evidence of forced representation or prioritizing ideology over narrative, it’s all about the story.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional values (family, religion, masculinity) aren't lampooned or subverted. Instead, the film examines individual delusion and fame obsession. No sign of mocking classic belief systems or pathologizing masculinity; its critique is targeted squarely at media culture.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

The film offers no real commentary on modern hot-button identity issues, and there’s no overt villainization of traditional values. If anything, it features a pluralistic look at human ambition and society’s fascination with fame, not any sort of political message.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

15%

22%

Movie poster for Big Trouble in Little China

10%

Movie poster for The Fabulous Baker Boys

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.