The Lizard (2004) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

20%

The Lizard2004

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Though a satire, 'The Lizard' avoids modern 'woke' pitfalls: it focuses on character-driven narrative, respects cultural traditions, and allows pluralism of perspective. A refreshingly non-woke gem by today's Hollywood standards.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

In our view, 'The Lizard' tells a grounded story focused on character and social context rather than identity politics. Characters are developed by personality and circumstances, not by checking diversity boxes. Identity factors don't overshadow genuine character arcs, and merit within the story world remains intact.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Mildly Woke

What is this?

While the film offers some gentle satire of clergy and religion, it also shows respect for tradition, faith, and community values. It critiques certain societal attitudes but does not strongly undermine religion, family, or masculinity in any overtly modern ideological sense.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

'The Lizard' engages diverse characters with varying beliefs, showcasing conflict, debate, and different perspectives. There’s no heavy-handed villain portrayal of traditional views or a forced embrace of modern moral doctrine. Alternative worldview is present, not simply mocked or dismissed.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Sometimes look at the sky

40%

Movie poster for The Man with Two Thousand Faces

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.