The Prophecy II (1998) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

12%

The Prophecy II1998

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

The Prophecy II is refreshingly non-woke by modern standards, sticking to genre tropes without heavy-handed identity politics or revisionist narratives. Its focus remains on fantastical storytelling and classic good-versus-evil stakes.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The Prophecy II sticks to a traditional supernatural thriller formula. Characters are cast based more on their suitability for the genre rather than identity checklists. There’s little sense of forced representation or prioritization of ideology over plot here.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Religious symbolism and themes play a central role, often leaning on classic biblical motifs. The film does not appear to mock traditional beliefs or subvert expected gender roles; instead, it focuses on good versus evil within recognizable frameworks.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative perspectives are not overtly villainized, angels and humans display moral complexity. There is no clear ideological agenda pressed onto the narrative; it’s more focused on fantasy elements than social commentary.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for The Prophecy 3: The Ascent

12%

Movie poster for From Dusk Till Dawn 3: The Hangman's Daughter

Movie poster for The Crow: City of Angels

10%

Movie poster for Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.