The Substance (2024) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

87%

The Substance2024

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

The Substance is a textbook case of modern cinema prioritizing woke messaging over balanced storytelling. With its heavy ideological slant, lack of cultural rootedness, and near-total narrative surrender to identity themes, it’s a high scorer on the woke meter for 2024.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The film centers on overt feminist themes, with significant attention given to female identity and empowerment. It often prioritizes messaging over nuanced character development or organic storytelling, leaning heavily into ideology at the expense of narrative depth.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Traditional gender roles and concepts of femininity and masculinity are aggressively subverted, portraying classic norms as toxic or outdated. Religion, family, and traditional morality are essentially left out or shown in a negative light. The focus on self-actualization and bodily autonomy drowns out classic cultural values.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Dissenting views are absent, and alternative perspectives are either mocked or not meaningfully explored. The film leans deeply into one-sided ideological territory, with all main characters sharing the same progressive worldview and little space for balanced debate or pluralism.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

60%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.