The War of the Roses (1989) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

12%

The War of the Roses1989

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

'The War of the Roses' is about interpersonal dysfunction, not modern ideology. While critical of marriage, it isn’t pushing any current 'woke' themes. It’s a dark, farcical tale focused on human nature, not identity politics.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

The film is mostly focused on the collapse of a marriage, with character flaws and relationships driving the plot rather than identity politics. Casting and characterization are classic, with no forced representation or overemphasis on identity categories. The story prioritizes entertainment and dark comedy over ideology.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Mildly Woke

What is this?

The film does satirize the institution of marriage and familial stability, presenting both parties as deeply flawed. Some viewers could interpret its cynicism as critical of traditional family values, but it does not go out of its way to undermine cultural foundations for ideological reasons.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative worldviews are present, both masculine and feminine perspectives are represented without preference for one over the other. Both characters are portrayed as complex and deeply flawed. There’s no clear ideological agenda or mocking of traditional perspectives.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

15%

Movie poster for History of the World: Part I

10%

15%

12%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.