Titanic II (2010) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Titanic II2010

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Despite its many cinematic sins, 'Titanic II' is about as non-woke as disaster movies get. The only thing progressive here is the ship moving steadily toward disaster.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

In our view, 'Titanic II' is more concerned with delivering a low-budget disaster spectacle than pushing any ideological agenda. Characters are basic archetypes with little overt emphasis on identity. The narrative flaws stem mainly from budget and writing, not from forced representation or 'woke' priorities.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

This film doesn’t bother to challenge traditional values or cultural norms , if anything, it’s a throwback to disaster genre tropes. Religion, family, and gender roles remain untouched and unexamined, perhaps because the film is more interested in sinking ships.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

No modern ideological themes, villainization of traditional values, or heavy-handed moral lessons to be found. The film’s perspective is generic, with no obvious attempt to push a worldview except: ‘icebergs are dangerous, folks.’

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Allan Quatermain and the Temple of Skulls

Movie poster for Transmorphers: Fall of Man

Movie poster for Haunting of Winchester House

Movie poster for The 7 Adventures of Sinbad

Movie poster for Mega Python vs. Gatoroid

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.