Wimbledon (2004) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Wimbledon2004

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Wimbledon is so blissfully pre-woke that it’s basically a time capsule for non-woke romantic comedies. No checklist casting, no subversion of gender roles, just some lighthearted fun on and off the tennis court.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Wimbledon sticks to classic romantic comedy territory. Characters are cast for fit rather than identity, and their personalities, flaws, and growth are front and center. There’s no sign that box-checking for diversity or ideology overtook the story’s charm or drama. It’s basically 'boy meets girl,' with tennis balls.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

Traditional romance, family, and ambition are treated with respect. Masculinity isn’t mocked, and family plays a supportive role without being criticized. The movie doesn’t rewrite cultural or gender roles to push any agenda, if anything, it feels rather conventional and nostalgic.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative viewpoints or traditional values aren’t ridiculed or caricatured. There’s no heavy-handed message, and characters don’t spout the same fashionable opinions. It’s refreshingly pluralistic, or, honestly, just not that concerned with politics at all.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Elizabeth: The Golden Age

23%

Movie poster for Captain Corelli's Mandolin

13%

12%

20%

45%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.