Beauty and the Beast (2012) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

72%

Beauty and the Beast2012

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

'Beauty and the Beast' (2012) showcases a clear lean toward 'girlboss' themes and brushes aside traditional role models, but it stops short of maximal wokeness. It’s more woke than classic non-woke TV, but not as aggressive about it as today’s blockbusters.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

The 2012 'Beauty and the Beast' leans on a procedural template but does noticeably center its narrative on a female detective's empowerment arc. While character identity plays a role, the story largely maintains its focus and doesn't entirely sacrifice narrative cohesion for messaging, though certain dynamics do feel forced to align with modern sensibilities.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

The show tends to depict traditional masculinity as troubled or dangerous while uplifting the female protagonist's perspective as more reasonable and courageous. Traditional family and relationship structures take a back seat to individual empowerment and modern moral codes, subtly pushing aside old-school values.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

There is some diversity of outlook, but traditional views usually serve as background noise or roadblocks to the protagonist's journey. Alternative viewpoints generally don’t get much nuanced exploration, and the show sits comfortably within the expected mainstream network ideology of its era.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.