Mr Loverman (2024) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

92%

Mr Loverman2024

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Mr Loverman leans heavily into its message, prioritizing modern identity politics and offering an almost textbook example of the current wave of ‘woke’ storytelling. Traditional values are mostly in the crosshairs rather than the spotlight.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Mr Loverman centers on the coming-out story of an older Caribbean-British man, with heavy emphasis on identity, sexuality, and generational trauma. Some viewers may feel character motivations sometimes bend to serve the larger narrative around social issues, with identity factors taking precedence over more universal storytelling.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The show reinterprets traditional family, masculinity, and religious ideals, often portraying them as stifling or problematic. It flips the script on classic norms, making the protagonist’s struggle primarily about liberation from those foundational aspects, which are rarely shown as positive forces.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

There’s little room given to sincerely presented alternative viewpoints. Dissenting perspectives on tradition or gender roles are mostly shown as obstacles or caricatured, without much nuance or sympathy, even when related to cultural heritage or generational values.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

33%

Movie poster for Six Wives with Lucy Worsley

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.