One Mississippi (2016) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

88%

One Mississippi2016

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

One Mississippi wears its ideology on its sleeve. The series delivers a thoroughly modern narrative where identity, social critique, and progressive values dominate. Traditional viewpoints are painted with broad strokes, making it a textbook example of current ‘woke’ storytelling trends.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Hyper Woke

What is this?

One Mississippi puts a heavy focus on the main character’s identity (gender, sexuality, trauma) over traditional storytelling. Personal identity and ideological themes often overshadow plot and organic character growth, giving the impression that message takes priority over narrative depth.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The show often critiques traditional Southern and family values, subtly mocking traditional masculinity and presenting religion and conventional family as sources of trauma or backwardness. There’s a clear push to highlight progressive values while subverting traditional ones.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative perspectives show up mostly in the form of caricatures or antagonists, with little room for genuine debate. The main cast tends to share the same worldview and modern moral assumptions, which leaves little space for pluralism or sincere depiction of tradition.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.