Partners (2014) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

75%

Partners2014

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Partners (2014) leans into modern themes, prioritizing representation and progressive identity politics over traditional storytelling and cultural foundations. Humor comes at the expense of genuine pluralism, landing the show squarely in woke territory, but it’s not a total lost cause for non-woke viewers seeking a few laughs.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

Partners (2014) centers around a straight lawyer and a gay lawyer running a firm together. There’s a definite emphasis on identity, sexuality takes precedence over more traditional storytelling at times. While there are genuine character moments, the show can feel more like a vehicle for highlighting diversity than focusing on deep narrative arcs.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

The show plays up modern social issues, particularly the dynamic of friendship and business between a gay and straight male lead. Family and religious themes are mostly sidelined, and masculinity is often subverted for comedic effect, though not entirely mocked. The traditional is generally presented as old-fashioned but not malicious.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative viewpoints don’t get much respectful airtime; the show’s humor and worldview largely support contemporary values around identity. Dissenters or more traditional characters are played as caricatures, and debates rarely feel balanced, if included at all.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

12%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.