Rumpole of the Bailey (1975) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Rumpole of the Bailey1975

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Rumpole of the Bailey is about as non-woke as TV gets. Its focus is old-school: clever writing, memorable characters, and respect for tradition. Modern ideological fixations are nowhere to be seen; if anything, this show is a gentle rebuke to today’s quota-driven culture.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Rumpole of the Bailey is all about character and wit, not identity politics. The series is driven by clever legal drama and nuanced personalities, not a checklist of representational boxes. There’s little evidence of shoehorned diversity or narrative sacrifice for the sake of modern ideologies.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

This show treats British legal tradition, family, and classic values with respect, sometimes with humor, but never contempt. While Rumpole’s irreverence might tweak some noses, it’s never at the direct expense of foundational cultural norms. Masculinity and traditional institutions are central, not lampooned.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative perspectives, within the context of law and morality, are frequently debated. Occasionally there is a little snark at the stuffy establishment, but traditional and dissenting views are generally both given fair play, with no clear ideological drum being banged.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for An American Werewolf in London

12%

Pollyanna

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.