Scam 2003: The Telgi Story (2023) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

15%

Scam 2003: The Telgi Story2023

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Scam 2003: The Telgi Story keeps its eye on the ball: crime, greed, and consequence in 1990s India. Its focus remains on authentic storytelling rather than box-ticking, making this one refreshingly low on the usual woke excess.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

Scam 2003: The Telgi Story focuses on the true story of Abdul Karim Telgi’s counterfeiting scam, prioritizing plot and character depth over any overt focus on diversity checkboxes. Characters are cast in ways that align with their real-life inspirations, and the storytelling remains grounded in realism.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

There’s minimal subversion of traditional Indian values here. Family dynamics, masculinity, and social mobility are presented in a realistic, culturally faithful manner – without gratuitous mocking or modern-inspired rewriting of Indian traditions or religious motifs.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

Different worldviews appear as the show explores greed, corruption, ambition, and social climbing, without heavy-handed lecturing or villainizing traditional perspectives. If anything, it’s a pretty straightforward cautionary tale about the failure of systems and personal morality.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Movie poster for Everybody Loves Sohrab Handa

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.