Silo (2023) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictHyper Woke

80%

Silo2023

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Silo delivers a visually interesting dystopia but can’t resist modern identity narratives. The focus on representation detracts from well-rounded character arcs, and traditional values get shuffled to the background. The lack of differing viewpoints gives the show a decidedly one-note, woke undertone.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

“Silo” puts noticeable focus on identity in its casting, particularly its lead and supporting roles. While the story remains intriguing, certain characters seem selected more for representation than narrative fit. Several personalities feel underdeveloped, suggesting diversity takes precedence over deeper character growth.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Hyper Woke

What is this?

The show seems eager to brush aside traditional cultural touchstones (family, religion) for bleak dystopian survival themes. Masculinity is not outright demonized, but strong female leads are elevated while most traditional roles are given little substance, feeling a bit revisionist in attitude.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Hyper Woke

What is this?

Alternative viewpoints are largely missing in 'Silo.' The social structure is unquestioned beyond the status quo, and any dissent tends to come from expendable or villainized characters. There’s a clear ideological thread throughout, with little pluralism or meaningful debate.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.