Slow Horses (2022) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

18%

Slow Horses2022

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Slow Horses is a breath of non-woke air with its focus on flawed characters, respect for tradition, and refusal to preach. The show delivers layered storytelling instead of lectures, making it a rare exception in today’s landscape. Non-woke viewers, rejoice.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Mildly Woke

What is this?

Slow Horses generally keeps its focus on sharp writing and flawed, complex characters, rather than prioritizing identity over competence or personality. Casting appears merit-based, sticking to story needs and realism for the most part. Any diverse casting feels organic instead of shoehorned, meaning ideology doesn't hijack the narrative.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The show treats traditional institutions, like intelligence services and the bumbling, world-weary masculinity of its lead, with a grudging respect. Themes concerning family, failure, and redemption take center stage over any deconstruction of tradition. There's minimal undercutting of classic virtues or culture.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

Alternative perspectives (from cynical, old-school spooks to earnest newcomers) are present and explored. Morality and intent are presented in a refreshingly pluralistic manner. There’s very little blanket villainization of dissent or traditionalism, this isn't an echo chamber for one ideology.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.