Something Is Out There (1988) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

Something Is Out There1988

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

A refreshingly non-woke relic from late-‘80s TV. "Something Is Out There" puts story first, doesn't push forced representation or woke ideology, and lets traditional values have their day in the sun. Worth a watch for those tired of modern TV’s ideological boxes.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

"Something Is Out There" mostly sticks to classic sci-fi and buddy cop tropes, with character development driven by skill and personality rather than box-checking identity traits. Diversity, where present, is not forced or foregrounded over the plot. The story's focus is on sci-fi thrills and teamwork.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The show comes from an era before cultural revisionism or subversion of traditional values became routine. Masculinity and family elements are present in a straightforward way, without undermining or mocking. There’s little attempt to reframe history, gender roles, or cultural values for modern sensibilities.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

There's no sign of forcing a single worldview. Characters express natural differences and occasionally clash, providing a sense of genuine pluralism. Dissenting or traditional perspectives are not caricatured or villainized, leaving plenty of room for less 'woke' outlooks to breathe.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Edison's Frankenstein

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.