Speechless (2016) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictWoke

52%

Speechless2016

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

Speechless takes some cues from modern identity politics, especially around disability, but grounds itself with good-hearted family humor. It isn’t aggressively woke by contemporary standards, but it does lean into woke talking points enough to be noticeable.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

Speechless centers on a family dealing with cerebral palsy, placing heavy emphasis on disability representation. While the show occasionally highlights identity over story during teachable moments, the core narrative remains focused on family dynamics and relatable humor, so ideological themes don't completely override authentic storytelling.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Woke

What is this?

Family, especially a quirky but strong one, is central to Speechless. Masculinity and traditional roles are lampooned for laughs at times, but the show ultimately affirms family unity and perseverance more than it undermines tradition. There's little direct subversion of cultural or religious foundations.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Woke

What is this?

Speechless makes points about disability rights and inclusivity, often through playful jabs at ableist assumptions. Traditional perspectives sometimes get reduced to stereotypes or ignorance, though the show tries to keep its tone light and inclusive rather than combative.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.