Broken Flowers (2005) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictNot Woke

13%

Broken Flowers2005

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

"Broken Flowers" is about as non-woke as it gets for a modern indie film. It focuses on character and existential themes over identity or ideology, refreshingly restrained compared to current trends.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Not Woke

What is this?

"Broken Flowers" sticks to traditional storytelling, focusing on Bill Murray's washed-up Don Johnston. Characters are written for narrative depth, not merely for identity points. The film avoids forced representation or artificial elevation of diverse characters; the roles serve the plot rather than ideological goals.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Not Woke

What is this?

The film explores themes of lost love, aging, and regret, centered on masculinity and personal history. While it de-romanticizes the main character's lifestyle, it doesn't attack family, faith, or masculinity itself. The traditional perspectives remain largely intact, without revisionism or heavy-handed subversion.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Not Woke

What is this?

Alternative perspectives are represented through a range of ex-girlfriends, all with different priorities and lifestyles. Traditional and alternative choices are portrayed with nuance, avoiding one-dimensional villainy or groupthink. There’s a respect for ambiguity rather than imposed ideology.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

17%

45%

75%

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.