Glitch (2015) | How Woke Is It?

Our VerdictMildly Woke

35%

Glitch2015

In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected speech. These reviews reflect personal opinions and not statements of fact.

What We Think

"Glitch" is more interested in existential questions and emotional stakes than lecturing its audience. It lands as low-woke TV by modern standards, character diversity arises naturally, and there’s little evidence of heavy-handed ideological messaging.

Score Breakdown

Compromised:Narrative Integrity

Woke

What is this?

While "Glitch" explores resurrection in a rural Australian town, it generally focuses on character-driven plots rather than pushing overt identity politics. The show features some diversity, but representation feels organic rather than shoehorned. Identity traits rarely overshadow essential character arcs or skill sets.

Compromised:Cultural Foundations

Mildly Woke

What is this?

Traditional family dynamics, personal morality, and even faith are present but not treated with outright contempt or ridicule. The series doesn’t aggressively challenge cultural norms, although it does present themes of personal crisis that might rub non-woke viewers the wrong way at times.

Compromised:Ideological Monoculture

Mildly Woke

What is this?

While the show nudges some modern values, it mostly avoids portraying alternative or traditional worldviews as villainous or backward. Core conflicts revolve around mystery and personal drama rather than ideological conformity or demonizing dissenting voices.

User Reviews

No user reviews received yet.

Please leave a review and let the world know what you think.
Your review will be kept completely anonymous.

Your Review

Comments

Users Also Viewed

12%

Movie poster for Paper Giants: The Birth of Cleo

Disclaimer: In a free society the right to critique art is essential and protected as a form of free speech and freedom of expression. The reviews and commentary on this site represent personal opinions and interpretations. They are not statements of fact and should not be taken as factual claims about any individual, company, or creative work.